Decline and Fall

This really, really doesn't help. It's bad enough that the opponents of the scientific consensus on global climate change paint everyone who sees the need for action to reduce carbon emissions as "environmental wackos," but when stupid celebrities stick their misinformed opinions into the debate, they only add fuel to the fire. Now everyone who makes the completely defensible claim that human activity is a primary contributing factor to melting ice sheets will have to deal with the thought in the backs of skeptics' heads that "this guy just wants me to use less toilet paper." Thanks a lot, Sheryl. Please return to your normal job of butchering Guns n' Roses songs and leave the advocacy to people who know how to frame their arguments.

As a corrective tonic, I submit the following site: How to Talk to a Climate Skeptic. It's a compendium of retorts to common misperceptions (and worse) about global climate change. This is the type of thing you will find if you click the above link:

Objection: Global warming has been going on for the last 20,000 years.

Answer: It is true that 20,000 years ago the temperature was some 8 to 10° C colder than it is today. But to draw a line from that point to today and say, "look, 20K years of global warming!" is dubious and arbitrary at best.

If you have look at this graph of temperature, starting at a point when we were finishing the climb out of deep glaciation, you can clearly see that rapid warming ceased around 10,000 years ago (rapid relative to natural fluctuations, but not compared to the warming today, which is an order of magnitude faster). After a final little lift 8,000 years ago, temperature trended downward for the entire period of the Holocene. So the post-industrial revolution warming is the reversal of a many-thousand-year trend.

A closer look at today's trend, within the context of the last 1,000 and 2,000 years, makes it even clearer that today's trend is striking -- opposite to what one would expect without anthropogenic interference.

(Courtesy of Global Warming Art. See source for details on the various reconstructions tangled above.)

If you really want to play the "global warming started X years ago" game, you should talk about how we're reversing a 5-million-year cooling trend -- or go crazy and track global temperatures right back to the origins of the planet! Not that there'd be much point ...

Thanks to 3 Quarks Daily for pointing me to this valuable site.

Labels: Environment, Framing, global warming